From inside the bubble

By Kelly

Further to yesterday’s post, an article came to my attention over the weekend that reinforced a suspicion that I have had for years; I live in a bubble. Actually I live in a bubble inside of a bigger bubble. The article, written by former federal Labor leader Mark Latham, discusses the shift in public opinion and disturbing rise of climate denialism. He speaks of a his own south-west Sydney community where very few ‘believe’ in climate change, let alone believe in the legitimacy of collective action on climate change. Five years ago the public shook their collective fist at the big polluters, I believe it often coincided with watching Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’. The same public congratulated themselves for considering a hybrid vehicle, they recycled, and they offset their air miles with a few dollars and a click of the mouse. However, the really inconvenient truth was yet to come; that these paltry actions were not enough to reign in soaring CO2 emissions. More drastic measures had to be taken, and any economist will tell you, the best way to do that is to send a price signal. Now that climate change has gone from fashionable to  fiscally inconvenient, there is a pronounced shift toward denying its existence.

Living in Canberra is like living in a bubble. And it would seem that studying at a Research School for Earth Sciences is to be sheltered even further. As climate scientists we work every day with the insurmountable evidence that our climate is changing and that this change is human induced. There is no more debate as to whether climate change is happening, more how, and where, and what can be done? However outside of the bubble there is growing sentiment that ignores rigorous scientific evidence in favour of the consumer-driven lifestyle which we are so accustomed. How can we be going backward in our thinking? But more importantly, how do we educate and inform the public more effectively? Perhaps it’s time to burst the bubble.

View the full version of this compelling article here.

One response to “From inside the bubble

  1. I first read the article during the week-end posted on facebook by one of my friends who studies law and it reminded me when I talked about science communication with a friend of mine. I was telling him how much I am concerned about the way we are addressing people on the situation “climate change” and if and there is something to be improved on this matter. I was speechless by his answer: “Honestly, I don’t care if people believe me or not, it’s not my job to communicate the things that I know or discover to others, that is the job of politicians”.
    I so much disagree. As fully-fledged scientists, we should learn how to deal with the audience. Just because we have in our hands the evidence that something is changing, it doesn’t mean that our contribution terminates there. I hope such discussion is going to bring to light the issue as there is the need to solve it as soon as possible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s