Did life originate with a bang?

By Adi

front

Well, the answer depends on what we mean by the “origin of life”. One could say that it all started 13.8 billion years ago with the birth of the universe – the “shock and awe” process we call the Big Bang. The impetus that kick-started the processes which led to primitive life-forms may have come from the seeding of our planet with molecules such as amino acids on asteroids, comets, stardust, or other cosmic bodies crashing into our young planet. Perhaps, the jolt to bring inanimate abiotic molecules together to form the precursors to biological molecules could have come from lighting strikes. This process of prebiotic synthesis was first experimentally tested back in 1952 by a graduate student Stanley Miller.

Stanley Miller, 1999. Credit: James A. SugarThe now famous Miller-Urey experiment was an impressive attempt to show that it was possible to synthesis life’s building blocks by simulating conditions of the early Earth. With nothing more than hydrogen, water, methane and ammonia, Miller was able prepare a concoction of amino acids – the building blocks of everything alive on Earth.

Stanley Miller performs his famous experiment. From "Astrobiology: The story of our search for life in the Universe." Credit: NASA /artwork by Aaron Gronstal.

Issue1_Astrobiology2_Page_09

Stanley Miller performs his famous experiment. From “Astrobiology: The story of our search for life in the Universe.” Credit: NASA /artwork by Aaron Gronstal.

Despite the ease of the experiment and the success of Miller’s attempt which catalysed an entire field of research, Miller had one piece of advice for other scientists: “Don’t do it.”

Turns out that sparking a charge of 60,000 V through a mixture methane, ammonia, and hydrogen, and that too continuously for a week, makes it really likely to end up with a loud bang! Hydrogen in particular has a tendency to ignite and explode with disastrous outcomes when there is an electric current passing through it – remember the Hindenburg airship?

prebiotic-soup Almost 60 years after the original ground breaking experiment, a team lead by Jeffery Bada, one of Miller’s students, has come up with a new simple and safer protocol which provides a better representation of Earth’s early conditions and yields new insight about life’s beginnings on the planet. For instance, using nitrogen (which does not ignite) instead of hydrogen and 30,000 V discharges, which are turned on and off to mimic the intermittent nature of lightening, reflects the primitive atmosphere more accurately.

Apart from being useful to origin of life researchers, this new protocol makes it easier for high school and undergraduate students around world to begin synthesising life in their labs. If there is one thing the Earth had in its favour which we have not had yet, it would have to be parallel processing.

january2012-26The origin of life was most likely a global phenomenon that took place simultaneously in the variety of environments hosted on the early Earth. About 4 billion years since life first took hold on the planet, it is time we begin replicating the Earth’s life factory on a high-throughput, networked, 3D synthesising workflow – in other words hundreds of thousands of impressionable students!

Sure, some students will make ‘mistakes’. Some will be more efficient than others and most are likely to end up with some sticky black goo on the sides of their flasks. But that is exactly what took place in the natural system. Thanks to the process of natural selection and evolution, we can be rest assured that our attempt will not be in vain.

video playGeologists, chemists, biologists, physicists (or whatever you like to call yourself), let’s get behind this call to arms and spread the word about the new Miller-Urey 2.0 protocol. The instructions are published at the Journal of Visualized Experiments. Although the paper is behind a paywall the video has been made freely availably at the Astrobiology Magazine.

Let’s just hope the kids don’t end up making Frankenstein… or worse still another Justin Bieber!

2 responses to “Did life originate with a bang?

  1. So it’s easy to make a some goo, but what happens then?
    If held my breath for say, ten minutes, I’d be a corpse, but all my bits would still be there. A pile of organs – even the immaculately assembly currently known as Rod needs something more to be alive.

    • Hi Rod,

      I suspect that if one has enough of the necessary goo in the appropriate environmental conditions for a sufficient amount of time we probably have all that would be needed for the origin of living systems. The thermodynamics and evolution takes over. Easier said than done ;-) Good thing nature had ample time to try different it in different ways!

      Look forward to learning about the latest in the Origin of Life research at an upcoming conference that I hope to attend in July. http://www.origin-life.gr.jp/origins2014/scientific.html
      Will be sure to report back in case someone announces any “significant” progress :-)

      Cheers,
      Adi.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s